Overview:
In the year 2044, time travel has not yet been invented but in 30 years it will have been. When the mob wants to get rid of someone, they will send their target into the past where a looper, a hired gun, like Joe is waiting to mop up. Joe is getting rich and life is good until the day the mob decides to close the loop, sending back Joe's future self for assassination.Status: | Released (2012-09-26) |
---|---|
Awards: | 18 wins & 47 nominations |
BoxOffice: | $66,486,205 |
Screen: | Rian Johnson |
Productions: | Endgame Entertainment, DMG Entertainment, Ram Bergman Productions |
Production Countries: | United States of America |
Spoken Languages: | English |
Casts
- 24045: Joseph Gordon-Levitt - Joe
- 62: Bruce Willis - Old Joe
- 5081: Emily Blunt - Sara
- 17142: Paul Dano - Seth
- 48312: Noah Segan - Kid Blue
- 15555: Piper Perabo - Suzie
- 8447: Jeff Daniels - Abe
Crews
- 4953: Ed Verreaux - Production Design - Art
- 67367: Rian Johnson - Director - Directing
- 62782: Douglas Hansen - Executive Producer - Production
- 59667: Steve Yedlin - Director of Photography - Camera
- 62775: Peter Schlessel - Executive Producer - Production
- 60047: Ram Bergman - Producer - Production
- 24045: Joseph Gordon-Levitt - Executive Producer - Production
fb: | twitter: | imdb: tt1276104 | insta:
Reviews
rookiebeotch
Review text:
movie was a little slow and drawn out. action was ok but story was little weak.
Continue reading ->Per Gunnar Jonsson
Review text:
I am normally fairly hesitant concerning time-travel movies because it is next to impossible to get them right. They more or less always become very unrealistic and full of paradoxes. I would almost go as far as to say that producers making serious (non-comedy) time travel movies are ....
Continue reading ->Andres Gomez
Review text:
The plot is full of flaws. Quite like a even worse inception.
Continue reading ->jw
Review text:
neither here nor there Time travel can be an exciting plot device - if the writers take time to check and get everything right. Unfortunately, with Looper, they did not. Nor did director or producers choose a clear direction what this movie was supposed to be, what its pace and at ....
Continue reading ->cineast78
Review text:
**Half-baked and weak genre mix with a pale Bruce Willis** The main character is an anti-hero and isn't able to win the viewer over story emotionally - that would be OK if the story were at least coherent - but it isn't. The time travel logic doesn't work. The telekinesis nonsense ....
Continue reading ->r96sk
Review text:
<em>'Looper'</em> is entertaining! I had a fun time with this one. I guess that would come as little surprise given I do like basically everyone onscreen from other flicks, while that is true that isn't the sole reason for my enjoyment. The story is intruiging and is presented nic ....
Continue reading ->